Operating systems for asset-intensive work
Site operations are fragmented across silos. KEVIN unifies them into one operating system.
One work object, one identity and one audit trail — from first signal to safe return to service.
Built by operators. Designed around the work.
Work rarely fails inside one system. It fails between them.
A work request begins in one place, technical context lives somewhere else, readiness is tracked in spreadsheets, and the field inherits the gaps. The result is familiar: duplicated effort, late discoveries and weak line-of-sight across the facility.
01
Disconnected context
Work orders, procedures, equipment history, permits and shift knowledge live in separate tools.
02
False readiness
A job can look scheduled while parts, hazards, access, isolation or Operations preparation remain unresolved.
03
Siloed handoffs
The work changes hands, but the full context does not travel with it.
04
Audit after the fact
Evidence is reconstructed from emails, attachments and individual memory instead of captured in the flow.
KEVIN. The colleague who never drops the ball.
The work-execution platform for the plant floor. KEVIN keeps the work object, the people, the controls and the evidence connected from backlog to return to service.
See how KEVIN worksOne work object. Every team. Full traceability.
KEVIN gives each discipline the view it needs without breaking the shared thread.
Feature 01
Prioritize the work that matters.
Bring backlog, risk, age, equipment context and operational impact into one decision view, so planners spend their time planning instead of reconstructing priority from memory.
Feature 02
Build a job that is actually ready.
Guide planners through steps, parts, tools, hazards, isolation, Operations preparation and return-to-service requirements before the job ever reaches the field.
Feature 03
Coordinate controls without losing the work.
Keep isolation, permits, approvals, tags and operating context connected to the same work object, from first signal to safe return to service.
KEVIN does not replace judgment. It clears the fog around it.
Recommend bundles, expose missing readiness, flag conflicting windows and surface similar work. Every recommendation shows its evidence so the user can accept, adjust or dismiss it.
Bring us the workflow that keeps breaking.
We will map the current handoffs, identify the highest-friction points and show where a shared work-execution backbone can make the work clearer.